The Role of Meaning Properties and Lexical Relations in Language Description: A Practical Course for Students of Linguistics

Prepared by the researche : Dr. Samir Al Jumaily – Postgraduate Department, International Colleges of Islamic Science, London, – United Kingdom

Democratic Arabic Center

Journal of cultural linguistic and artistic studies : Thirty-sixth Issue – June 2025

A Periodical International Journal published by the “Democratic Arab Center” Germany – Berlin

:To download the pdf version of the research papers, please visit the following link

https://democraticac.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AB%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%BA%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%AF%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%B3-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AB%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AB%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%AD%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%E2%80%93-%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%88-2025.pdf

Abstract

Describing language is a challenging task for students of linguistics, as it requires an understanding of how languages function, their internal structures, and their role in communication. Purpose: This study aims to assist students in analyzing various linguistic characteristics when describing languages, as well as clarifying several important linguistic aspects and concepts essential in language description. These include the properties of human language, linguistic features, lexical relations, and semantic, pragmatic, and conceptual meanings. Approach/Methodology: The methodology employed to achieve this objective involves a thorough examination of extensive references and a substantial body of written literature on these linguistic characteristics. Originality/Value of the study: This study is both comprehensive and original, offering valuable insights from literature not commonly found in textbooks or other references. Findings: Consequently, this practical course highlights the significant implications of the study as a whole. Practical Implications: Ultimately, the findings suggest that for linguistics students to fully grasp these properties and relations, they must actively engage with the material and conduct effective linguistic analyses.

1. Introduction:

Language description is an important discipline that aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how languages function, both in terms of their internal structures and their use in communication. It is essential for students of linguistics to learn how to describe languages, as this skill is fundamental for enabling them to compare various linguistic characteristics and grasp the diverse types of properties and relationships that arise when analyzing linguistic features. This study seeks to investigate, discuss, and illustrate nearly all the properties and relationships relevant to the study of language, as it is a complex system of communication that conveys messages and distinguishes human language from other aspects of communication. To explore the effects and roles of meaning properties and lexical relationships in language description, the researcher gathers data through observation, consulting various perspectives and resources, and examining the underlying rules and patterns that govern language. Learning the meaning properties and lexical relations of words will undoubtedly enhance personal communication skills as well as our collective comprehension of language as a whole. This approach promotes accuracy, clarity, and depth in our use and comprehension of language.

1.1 Background of the study:

Not only has the field of semantics witnessed significant progress, but linguistic theories in general have also advanced in modelling human language ability, lexical relations, and meaning properties, which have become more central to those theories. The existence of such a variety of properties and relationships requires some kind of explanation. One might ask “Are these properties and relationships among words, or the things the words represent? Are the cognitive faculties or features? Are the relations arbitrary or rule-based”? (Murphy, 2003, p. 3). These points are the focus of this study. This paper is an indispensable resource for university-level students of linguistics. It is designed in a way that provides easy access to the linguistic and semantic features that are central in linguistic study, matches their level, and meets their needs. It is a concise, comprehensive introductory course tackling the role of meaning properties and lexical relations in language description. Having taught linguistics for many years, the researcher made every effort to find a reference that gathers all the properties of human language, including linguistic properties, semantic properties, lexical relations, syntagmatic and paradigmatic concepts, and pragmatic aspects, but unfortunately was not successful. Therefore, the researcher has taken on the task of investigating and summarizing all these characteristics and aspects in this practical course. This course is designed to help struggling students of linguistics overcome this problem and consequently develop their linguistic skills to master all these aspects. For example, Saeed, in his widely used book “Semantics”, as well as some other semanticists, in their literature, covered all meaning properties and lexical relations, but made no mention of human language characteristics, except Yule (2020, pp. 14-18), who neglected discreteness, patterning, and prevarication. Moreover, these scholars paid no attention to the difference between the properties of human language and linguistic properties that students badly need to know. None of them identified and explained the factors behind the difficulty of distinguishing between these two types of properties. Therefore, to bridge this gap, to show the impact of these characteristics on language description, and to assist students in easily comprehending this role, the researcher has taken on the burden of investigating and summarizing all these characteristics and aspects in this practical course. This course is designated to help struggling students of linguistics overcome this problem and consequently develop their linguistic skills to master all these aspects.

1.2 Literature review:

The study of language description is considered the foundation for various applications and uses, such as teaching, translating, computational linguistics, preserving endangered languages, and significantly contributing to our understanding of human language. Therefore, to describe language accurately, a linguist should consider the principles of semantic theory. Analyzing and examining meaning properties, human language properties, and lexical relations are crucial concepts of semantics. This study aims to investigate the role played by these properties and relations in language description, as no comprehensive reference has been found to address all these aspects, including human language properties. Consequently, this study will broadly address this topic. However, the initial question that needs to be answered is: What should a semantic theory do and how? The primary goal of a linguistic-semantic theory is to demonstrate how meaning is conveyed through language. Its main function is to describe how words, phrases, and sentences are combined to convey meaning.

Due to the ambiguity present in some expressions, semantic theory should address and explain how these ambiguities rise and are resolved. Therefore, semantic theory representations, such as semantic networks or characteristic structures, are utilized to analyze the meaning of linguistic expressions. Essentially, a semantic theory must provide a structural explanation of how meaning is generated and understood, employing both formal and empirical approaches to address the complexities of linguistic meaning. To answer the question, ‘How should a semantic theory address these semantic properties and relations?’, it is by explaining how meaning is organized and understood, addressing semantic properties and relationships in language through systematic and structured illustrations. Thus, the focus of this study (course) is on the analysis of meaning properties and lexical relations, as well as the role they play in language description.

2. The properties of human language and linguistic properties:

It is common for students of linguistics to wonder whether there is a distinction between the properties of human language and linguistic properties. The answer is a definite YES even though the terms are closely related. Students of linguistics often find it challenging to differentiate between the properties of human language and linguistic properties for various reasons. The following literature will provide a broad illustration of both concepts and then clarify the difference between the two.

2.1 Properties of human language:

Generally speaking, language is considered a system or a means of communication used to express ideas, feelings, and information to meet people’s needs. It is a highly sophisticated system that conveys messages. Definition the word ‘language’ can be challenging, as it can refer to different types or meanings depending on the context in which it is used (such as the language of music, gesture, body language like posture and eye-gaze). According to Bloch and Trager (1942, p. 5) in their Outline of Linguistic Analysis, “language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols by means of which a social group cooperates”, but Hall (1968, p.158) in his Essay on Language states that language is “the institution whereby humans communicate and interact with each other by means of habitually used oral-auditory arbitrary symbols.” The focus here is on communication and interaction. Human language is distinguished by several unique characteristics compared to animal communication systems or other forms of communication. The following are the main properties of human language a student of linguistics should know:

1. Arbitrariness: refers to the meanings of a language’s words and sounds that are not inherently connected. For example, there is no rational reason to refer to a small, fuzzy mammal as a ‘CAT’. Human language arbitrariness based on convention and tradition with no intrinsic connection between the word and the object it symbolizes.
2. Discreteness: means that language consists of discrete units, such as phonemes, morphemes, and words that can be combined in different ways to create meaning. For instance, replacing the /p/ sound with the /b/ sound in the sentence ‘Can we park here?’ will entirely change the meaning of the word park as well as the sentence as a whole. Therefore, it is an incorrect use of language.
3. Displacement: refers to the ability of humans to talk or communicate about things and events that are absent and not available in the immediate context, including things from the past or future as well as abstract concepts. It is the ability of a speaker to discuss concepts and ideas that are not limited to the present moment. This is one of the distinct properties of human language that was identified by the American linguist Charles Hockett in 1960, p, 88.
4. Creativity (productivity): refers to the ability of humans to create and understand an infinite number of novel utterances whenever they want, in order to establish flexibility in communication and demonstrate the generative capacity of language.
5. Cultural transmission: is the process by which language is passed from one generation to another. Humans have innate dispositions (natural qualities) to acquire language, but these abilities need to be activated through communication and contact with others. Language is typically learned within a specific context, through exposure to various aspects of speech in social interaction. Therefore, language acquisition is not impossible without cultural transmission.
6. Duality: language typically consists of both meaningless and meaningful elements. Meaningless elements, such as phonemes and letters, can become meaningful when arranged systematically to create utterances. Therefore, a fundamental aspect of human language is its organization into two layers or levels: a layer of sounds or segments that lack meaning, such as a, t, and e, and a second layer of larger units combined in specific sequences to form linguistic forms (words). The sounds mentioned above are meaningless on their own, but can be given meaning when combined; according to specific rules, as seen in sequences like ate, eat, and tea. This characteristic is known as duality or double articulation.
7. Patterning: refers to the arrangement of both sounds and words in a language. For example, in English there are strict rules regarding which sounds or words can be used and the order in which they can appear. There is a fixed set of possibilities for substituting items, with each item having a specific place in the overall pattern. For example, the sounds /a, b, s, t/ can be combined in only four possible arrangements in English: bats, stab, bast, tabs. Combinations like *sbat, *abts, and *stba are not possible. (See Aitchison, 2003, p. 17).
8. Prevarication: refers to the acts of deceiving or misleading, allowing individuals to say things that are untrue in order to avoid giving a direct answer to a question or expressing their true thoughts.
9. Reflexivity: means language can be used to discuss language itself, enabling conversation about language usage, structure, and metalinguistic awareness. These properties collectively distinguish human language from other forms of communication and lighting its complexity and versatility. These properties are inherent in all human communication through language, making it essential for the study of language. It is crucial for students of linguistics to have a clear understanding of these properties.

2.2 Properties of human language vs. linguistic properties:

As previously mentioned, there is a clear a distinction between the properties of human language and linguistic properties. The properties of human language encompasses universal and common characteristics shared by all languages globally, while linguistic properties are specific to individual languages, allowing for differentiation between them. Both sets of properties are essential in comprehending the nature and diversity of human language. Within the realm of linguistic properties, there exist various dimensions, including phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic aspects. These linguistic properties serve as focal points in the fields of descriptive linguistics and typology. By delving into these features and relationships, linguists and students of linguistics can grasp how languages ​​are structured, how meanings are conveyed, and how words interconnected in diverse contexts. Understanding this these concepts is vital for dissecting and elucidating the intricate language systems present in different languages ​​and cultures. Therefore, individuals studying linguistics or those with an interest in this field must possess knowledge of these common characteristics of human language that are prevalent across to all human societies. This knowledge aids in understanding what sets human language apart, as individuals often struggle to differentiate between properties of human language and linguistic properties due to various reasons. Some of these reasons are:

1. The abstract nature of linguistic concepts: means that the linguistic properties mentioned above (phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics) are highly abstract. However, there are practical applications of these concepts.
2. Overlap with common language intuitions: many linguistic properties may seem intuitive, natural, and strongly connected to the daily use of language. However, they can be challenging factors for students of linguistics to distinguish between what is unique to human language as a cognitive phenomenon and what is specific to the structure and rules of language.
3. Requirement for deep analysis: students must analyze language structures at different linguistic levels, including phonetic and phonological, syntactic, semantic and pragmatic levels. Understanding the distinctions between these levels and how they interact can be difficult, particularly when similar concepts are present in multiple languages.
4. Complexity of Universal Grammar: according to the theory of Universal Grammar (UG), all human languages share common fundamental aspects and ideas. A thorough understanding of theoretical linguistics and cognitive science is necessary to comprehend UG and its implications for linguistic properties.
5. Lack of concrete examples: linguistic theories provide frameworks for understanding the structure and behavior of language. However, students may struggle when trying to apply these theories to specific data or phenomena. This gap between theory and practice can be a serious obstacle for students trying to grasp the difference between universal properties of human language and language-specific properties.
6. Cross-disciplinary confusion: arises when various disciplines such as psychology, anthropology, cognitive science, and others intersect with linguistics. This can lead students to become confused when faced with conflicting terminology or perspectives from these disciplines, making it difficult for them to differentiate between linguistic properties and more general cognitive or cultural traits. In essence, language properties examine the distinct characteristics of different languages or language families, while linguistic properties focus on broader theoretical aspects that are universal to all languages. Language properties are commonly used for describing and analyzing specific languages, while linguistic properties establish the theoretical foundation and principles for the study of language as a whole. It is important to introduce the learner to other crucial aspects or concepts of properties in linguistic studies, such as meaning properties and conceptual properties.
7. The scope of meaning properties:

Lyons (1977, p. 57) states, “Meaning properties is one of several features or components which together can be said to make up the meaning”. The concept of ‘meaning properties’ refers to a variety of qualities or characteristics that words, phrases, or sentences have and usually contribute to their overall meaning. These properties help us understand the information that language conveys, and how different linguistic components work together to create coherent communication. Below are some examples of these meaning properties:

1. Ambiguity: refers to the concept of having multiple meanings or interpretations. It occurs when a word, phrase, or sentence can be understood in more than one way, leading to uncertainty or confusion. For example, the word ‘bank’ could mean a financial institution or the edge of a river. This lack of clarity can make the meaning of a word unclear when taken out of context. Sometimes, even within a context, ambiguity can arise. For instance, the sentence ‘The lamb is too hot to eat’ could be interpreted in two ways depending on whether ‘lamb’ refers to a live animal or meat on a plate. If it is a live animal, then the weather/heat is preventing it from eating and it may be thirsty. If it is just meat on a plate, then the person wanting to eat it must wait for it to cool down. Ultimately, the proper interpretation is determined by the situation and the context in which the word is used.
2. Anomaly: the term ‘anomaly’, in general, refers to something that deviates or is different from normal, standard, or expected. It departs from the regular norm, pattern, or behavior. It is usually used in science, statistics, and technology to describe observations or data points that stand out because of their abnormal nature. For example, the sentence “The cat barks loudly” is abnormal since cats usually do not bark and such behavior is beyond the norm and expectation.
3. Contradictory: refers to statements or propositions that cannot both be true simultaneously in any conceivable situation or state of affairs. Contradictions are fundamental to understanding the limits of meaning and truth within language. A distinctive example of a contradictory statement is “This statement is false,” causing a paradox where evaluating its truth or value becomes impossible.
4. Meaningfulness: refers to the ability and quality of language to effectively convey significant information, purpose, or intention. It allows a speaker to express his/her thoughts and opinions and to understand others’ utterances within a linguistic or social context. It also focuses on whether a statement or expression has coherent and understandable content. An expression must follow the semantic rules of the language to be meaningful. Simply adhering to syntactic rules is not enough for an expression to convey its meaning. For example, a statement like “Water boils at 100 ℃” is meaningful because it conveys a clear and factual statement.
5. Redundancy: in the context of language and communication, redundancy refers to the use or addition of unnecessary repetitive elements that do not enhance the message’s clarity or meaning. However, some people believe that despite its apparent inefficiency, redundancy in communication serves several crucial purposes. These include enhancing clarity and understanding, aiding recall and memory, facilitating error detection, and fulfilling cultural and social function expectations (reflecting norms or traditions within a particular language or community). These characteristics influence our comprehension and analysis of language, communication, and meaning in various settings. Understanding them helps interpret spoken or written materials, address uncertainties, detects irregularities and ensure coherent and unambiguous communication. For students of linguistics to fully grasp the value and fascination of the subject and navigate through all key topics in the field of language description, they must differentiate between semantic meaning and pragmatic meaning (Hurford, J. R. et al., 2007, p. 3).
6. Semantic meaning vs. pragmatic meaning:

Semantic meaning and pragmatic meaning are two distinct aspects of language that play a crucial role in communication and interpretation although “semantics and pragmatics denote related and complementary fields of study, both concerning the transmission of meaning through language. Drawing the line between the two fields is difficult and controversial” (Saeed, 2023, p. 17). Understanding the disparity between these two types of meaning is essential for students of linguistics to grasp the true function of language in conveying messages. Semantic meaning, also known as linguistic meaning refers to the literal interpretation of words, phrases, and sentences. It deals with the explicit, denotative content of language and focuses on what these words and expressions themselves signify without taking into account the context or intention of the speaker. Pragmatic meaning indicates “other aspects of meaning that depend more on the context and the communicative intentions of speakers” (Yule, 2020, p. 149). On the other hand, pragmatic meaning encompasses the implicit and figurative meaning that is derived from context, social cues, background knowledge, and speaker intention. It focuses on how language is used in specific situations to convey nonliteral meanings. For example, the statement ‘The window is open,’ may imply a request to close it, based on the context. The key distinctions between semantic and pragmatic meaning lie in their basis, context dependency, and interpretation. Semantic meaning is rooted in the direct interpretation of linguistic elements, while pragmatic meaning relies heavily on understanding implied or intended meaning within a given context. It is the hearer’s interpretation of language. Semantic meaning is relatively context-independent and dictionary-based, whereas pragmatic meaning is context-dependent and influenced by social, cultural, or situational factors. Semantic meaning pertains to explicit content, while pragmatic meaning encompasses implied, intended, or inferred meanings. In this view, semantics is concerned with sentence meaning and pragmatics with speaker meaning. In summary, the meaning related to speakers and listeners is referred to as pragmatics, whereas meaning that is abstracted away from users is termed semantics. Furthermore, conceptual meaning emphasizes cognitive representation and associations linked to linguistic expressions. Grasping these nuances is essential for a thorough understanding of language and its complexities.

5. Semantic meaning vs. conceptual meaning:

These two types of meaning are interconnected, yet they exhibit distinct differences in the study of language and cognition. Semantic meaning, also referred to as linguistic meaning, pertains to the meaning conveyed by the literal use of words, phrases, sentences, or symbols within a specific linguistic context. Its primary focus, as previously mentioned, is on the relationships between expressions- such as words and sentences- and their referents or denotations in the real world. Conversely, conceptual meaning relates to the cognitive concepts or mental representations that underpin and are evoked by linguistic expressions. Conceptual meaning encompasses mental images, ideas, categories, and cognitive structures that individuals associate with these expressions. In summary, semantic meaning is vital for determining the truth conditions and logical interpretations of sentences, while conceptual meaning is essential for understanding the deeper significance of language beyond its surface structure, including metaphorical or abstract uses. Any comprehensive study of the properties of meaning in language description must include lexical relations. Understanding these properties and relationships enables linguists and students of linguistics to grasp how languages are structured, how meanings are conveyed, and how words relate to one another in various contexts. For the students of linguistics to gain a thorough understanding of language description and expand their linguistic knowledge, they must learn about and consider the lexical or meaning relations that play a significant role in this field.

6. The scope of lexical or meaning relations:

Words can be seen as more than just symbols or tools that serve functions in events; they can also be interconnected. Lexical or meaning relations are crucial semantic aspects that play a significant role in determining the meaning of terms in the English language. These relations refer to the different types of relationships that exist between words in a given context. Therefore, they are considered one of the most important semantic relations in the study of word meanings in English, ultimately language aiding in the comprehension of those meanings. Their primary purpose is to analyze and describe word meanings based on how they relate to one another within sentences. Through the concept of lexical fields, lexical relations are most commonly found between lexemes within the same field (Saeed, 2023, p. 63). In his book, The Study of Language, Yule (2020, p. 134) mentions that lexical relations are used to indicate any paradigmatic relation among words. These relationships vary depending on the type of relationship a word may have with one or more other words. Yule (2020, p. 134) also explains that the branch of semantics that focuses on word meanings is known as lexical semantics. It is well-known that in everyday conversations, the meaning of lexical items is often interpreted based on their relationships. For example, if someone enquires about the meaning of “freedom”, we might easily say, it is synonymous with “liberty” or “sad” as opposed to “happy” or “horse” as a type of animal. This method demonstrates that we describe or define the meaning of each term not solely based on its individual characteristics, but also in relation to other words in a specific context. Lexical relations serve as the building blocks of semantic networks, which classify words according to their meanings and relationships. There are various types of these lexical relationships, as outlined below:

1. Synonymy: refers to sameness in meaning, where two or more words have closely related meanings. Examples: include almost/nearly, and freedom/liberty.
2. Antonymy: is the opposite of synonymy, involving two words with opposite meanings. Examples: include small x big, buy x sell, and poor x rich.
3. Polysemy: refers to the phenomenon where a single term can have multiple meanings. While most terms have distinct meanings, polysemy occurs when a term is associated with a set of different meanings. For instance, the word ‘head’ can refer to the physical body part or to a person in a position of authority within a company (Palmer, 1976, p. 65).
4. Homonymy: refers to the phenomenon of a single form or word having two or more unrelated meanings but sharing the same pronunciation and spelling. Examples include:

bat (flying creature) ————— and bat (used in sport)

race (contest of speed) ———— and race (ethnic group)

sole (single) ————————- and sole (part of foot or shoe)

According to Saeed (2023, p. 63), “Some authors distinguish between homographs, senses of the same written word, and homophones, senses of the same spoken word.” To support this perspective, he provides examples such as lap (a circuit of a course) and lap (a part of the body when sitting down) as homographs, and the verbs wring and ring, which have different spellings, as examples of homophones.

1. Hyponymy: refers to the concept of meaning inclusion; where the meaning of one word is encompassed within the meaning of another. This relation can be seen in examples such as animal/cow, and flower/rose.
2. Superordinate: terms represent a class of words to which other words belong, such as vegetables (carrot, cabbage, spinach, and lettuce), and birds (swallow, crane, canary, woodpecker, and quail). According to Yule (2020, p.136), “two words or more that share the same superordinate term are co-hyponyms.” Therefore, cat and dog are co-hyponyms, and the superordinate term is animal.
3. Prototype: it is considered the “characteristic instance” of a category. While the words canary, cormorant, dove, duck, flamingo parrot, pelican, and robin are all equally co-hyponyms of the subordinate category “bird”, they are not all considered to be good examples of the category bird. Some researchers confirm that the most characteristic instance of the category bird is the robin.
4. Homophones: are two or more words with different spellings but the same pronunciation. Examples: write/right, flower/flour, to/too/two, meat/meet, and sun/son.
5. Metonymy: is the use of a word to refer to other things. It involves a relation-based container-content connection, such as bottle/water, or can/juice, as well as whole-part relationships like house.
6. Meronymy: represents a type of relationship, both linguistic and conceptual, in which one word (usually a noun) represents a part of another word or concept. It illustrates how a whole is connected to its parts. For example, “finger” is considered a meronym of “hand”, as fingers constitute parts of the hand. Similarly, a wheel is considered a meronym of a car as it is a part of a car. Therefore, meronymy involves words that denote part-whole relationships. It is the antonym of holonymy, which involves the connection between a complete entity and its elements. In line with Yule’s perspective, where he mentioned that lexical relations indicate paradigmatic relation among words and broaden the scope of the study to crucial aspects of semantic relations, it is important to provide students of linguistics with data related to identifying and distinguishing between pragmatic and syntagmatic meanings. (Some of the examples above are retrieved from Yule, 2020, pp. 134-9).
7. Syntagmatic vs. paradigmatic relations:

Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations are fundamental concepts in structural linguistics, introduced by Ferdinand de Saussure and further developed in structuralism and post-structuralism linguistic theories. These two concepts assist linguists in describing and understand how words and linguistic units relate to one another within a language system. Syntagmatic relations are the sequential relationships between linguistic units (e.g., words, phrases, clauses) in a sentence or discourse. For example, in the sentence ‘The dog chased the cat’, the words form a syntagmatic sequence where each word follows another in a particular order to convey meaning. This helps in examining the development of language over time and play a major role in the consistency and unity of texts regarding coherence and cohesion. On the other hand, paradigmatic relationships involve choosing a specific linguistic unit among alternatives that could all fit into the same sentence slot. For instance, in completing the sentence “I love my ________,” various words like father, mother, wife, son, and daughter) could fill in the blank. However, the choice of one word excludes others and establishes a paradigmatic relationship among the choices. In terms of language description, these aspects help in explaining how words are related through the use of polysemy, synonymy, hyponymy, antonymy, etc., to aid in comprehending semantic networks. In conclusion, paradigmatic options greatly impact the style and tone in writing or speaking and also affect the expressiveness of language.

8. The significance of meaning properties and lexical relations in language description:

In the field of language description, understanding these properties and connections not only assists linguists but also helps learners comprehend how language is structured, how meaning is conveyed, and how words relate to one another in various situations and contexts. These topics are essential for analyzing and verifying the intricate nature of language systems across different languages and cultures. Meaning properties and lexical relations provide a systematic foundation for understanding how words are structured, organized, and interpreted in human language. By clarifying the subtleties and connections within words, they enable individuals to communicate clearly and accurately understand each other’s intentions, leading to effective communication. Examining lexical relations and meaning properties in cognitive science helps elucidate how language is processed, stored, and accessed in the human brain, contributing to theories of language learning, representation, and production.

9. Findings and conclusions

This study has concluded the fact that language description is a complex subject, as it provides a comprehensive understanding of how languages function, taking into account their intricate internal structures and communicative uses. Due to the complexity of the language description process and the various linguistic characteristics and relationships involved, students of linguistics often struggle to grasp these concepts. Language description serves as a foundation for numerous applications, including teaching, translation, computational linguistics, and the preservation of endangered languages. Additionally, it significantly contributes to our understanding of human language, which is distinct from other forms of communication. In the process of language description, it is crucial for both linguists and learners alike to understand the properties of meaning and lexical relationships. This understanding aids in comprehending language structure, conveying meaning effectively, and grasping word relationships in various contexts. The study concluded that examining these properties and lexical relations enhances personal communication skills and fosters a collective understanding. This approach promotes accuracy, transparency, and depth in our use and understanding of language. Regarding the properties of human language and linguistic properties, the study has found that language properties analyze the unique traits of individual languages or language groups, while linguistic properties evaluate universal theoretical aspects that apply to all languages.

The role of meaning properties and lexical relations is significant and effective in language description. These properties and relationships have greatly impact on our comprehension and analysis of language, communication, and meaning in various contexts. Understanding these aspects will undoubtedly enhance our ability to interpret spoken or written content, clarify doubts, identify inconsistencies, and ensure      coherent and unambiguous communication. It is highly essential for students of linguistics to grasp the importance, value and fascination of the subject, covering all necessary language description topics. They also need to understand the difference between semantic meaning and pragmatic meaning, as each addresses different dimensions of communication and interpretation. To overcome challenges, educators should incorporate a variety of strategies. These include using actual linguistic examples from different languages to explain abstract concepts, motivating learners to compare and contrast properties of languages to identify universal codes versus language-specific variations, establishing discussions and activities that require learners to apply theoretical concepts to analyze real linguistic data, providing clear definitions and conceptual frameworks to differentiate between properties of human language and linguistic properties, and highlighting interdisciplinary links to emphasize the contributions of linguistic studies to understanding human language. By addressing these obstacles and providing learners with various perspectives and practical applications, educators can definitely assist them developing a deep understanding of the differences among properties of human language, linguistic properties, and lexical relations.

In conclusion, the description of language plays an essential role in understanding, preserving, teaching, and using languages in various aspects of human interaction and comprehension. It serves as a fundamental tool in linguistics and other related fields, contributing to academic research and practical applications in different culture and societal contexts. Semantic theory is responsible for providing a structural explanation of how meaning is created and interpreted in language; utilizing various approaches to address the complexities of language meaning. Through our academic experience teaching linguistics in various Middle Eastern countries, we have observed that some students confuse the properties of human language with linguistic properties. It is evident that the field semantics has made significant advancements in modeling human language capabilities, lexical relationships, and meaning attributes, which are now central to linguistic theories. To conclude, language description involves categorizing and describing the structural, functional, and cultural aspects of a language. It encompasses phonetics, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics to provide a comprehensive understanding of language functioning. To help students of linguistics overcome challenges, instructors must offer multiple perspectives and practical applications to foster deep understanding of all concepts and aspects crucial to language description.

10. References:

Aitchison, Jean. (2003). Teach Yourself: Linguistics. London: Hodder Education, pp. 16-20.

Bloch, B. & Trager, G. L. (1942). Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic

           Society of America/Waverly Press, p. 5.

Hall, R. A. (1968). An Essay on Language. Philadelphia & NY: Chilton Books, p. 158.

Hurford, J. R. et al. (2007). Semantics: A Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University

            Press, p. 3.

Hockett, F. Charles and Charles D. Hockett. (1960). The Origin of Speech. NY: Scientific

            American Magazine, Scientific American, a division of Nature, Inc. Vol. 203, No. 3, pp.

            88-97.

Lyons, John. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, p. 57.

Mansoor, M. (2014). Linguistics: A Practical Course for the Study of Language. Erbil: Haval

            Art Printing Press, pp. 6-9.

Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic Relations and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge

            University Press, p. 3.

Palmer, F. R. (1976). Semantics: A New Outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

65. 65.

Saeed, John. (2023). Semantics. 5th edition. Massachusetts: Wiley Blackwell Publishing, pp.

            17, 59, 63.

Yule, G. (2020). The Study of Language. 7^th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

9. 14-18, 134-9.