الدكتور ميلاد مفتاح الحراثي
Dr Milad ELHARATHI
Three years after Libyan’s revolution, the country’s elected the National Congress an Islamist-led coalition known as the Islamists Troika—has controlled the Libyan political scenario, although of the political pressure by secular opposition forces in the Islamists controlling National Congress. As they look toward the next general election, Libya’s secular party, largely sidelined after the revolution, are seeking greater prominence in politics. To achieve this goal, they must tackle deep-seated challenges and find a way to cooperate more closely.
Libyan politics are more complex than a binary competition between secularists and Islamists. Secular party’ ideological rivalries, strategic differences, and leadership divisions undermine their force in politics. After February of 2011 revolution that ousted then Kaddafi regime , secular party failed to form strong coalitions, develop regional networks, or create viable party platforms, often using anti-Islamist rhetoric to attract voters instead of offering solutions to Libya’s challenges. Some were perceived to have been co-opted by the former political system elements.
The secular party with a well-defined platform and ideological stance, especially regarding the ruling Islamist Freedom and Justice party, proved more resilient than ideologically diverse party or those relying on a popular leader to unite a fragmented base. Many secular party lack internal democracy, with leaders making decisions unilaterally or with their cronies, who act in their self-interest.
Generally, party legalized after the revolution lack a clear unifying vision and strategy. Secular and Islamists voices, backed by major media outlets and civil society organizations, have gained popular support. The passage of Libya’s new transition constitution on June 2011, and the transition to a government of technocrats has in many ways hit a reset button on Libyan politics. For the four years since the revolution that ousted then president Khadafy regime in February 2011, Libya has seen increasingly polarized debate over the constitution and the future political direction of the country.
Since 2011, secular party have profited from a deteriorating economic situation and the emergence of religious violence, which has led wide sectors of the population to fear unchecked Islamism. Members of the secular , an alliance of secular coalition opposition forces, blamed Islamists for the assassinations of military and civil figures from 2012-2014, which stoked the fires of anti-Islamism in the country.
Yet even in this new political climate, many secular party still limit their strategy to proclaiming that they “saved” the country from the Islamists instead of focusing on developing convincing party platforms that address Libya’s underlying socioeconomic needs. This practice continues despite the fact that the experiences of secular opposition party after the revolution suggest that their focus on anti-Islamism is one of their greatest weaknesses. Relying on anti-Islamist rhetoric reflects not only this party’ detachment from the population’s needs and expectations but also their lack of a strong unifying vision and strategy.
Indeed, secular opposition party in Libya have long been fragmented because of their own internal divisions. As a result of this disorganization, opposition party were completely unprepared to step into the void when Khadafy was forced out of power. Instead, many filled the post revolutionary vacuum by returning to a deep-seated secular-Islamist divide that had dominated politics under the old regime. Their inability to form strong coalitions and their reliance on anti-Islamist rhetoric contributed to their poor performance in the first democratic election after the revolution.
Secular party is approaching the next elections, and they have created a number of coalitions, such as the Union for Libya, the Popular Front, which helped force the Islamists government out of office. To ensure a better performance in the next elections, secular party need to sustain a great deal of unity by addressing deep structural and leadership challenges.
Secular party will have to go beyond resorting to fierce anti-Islamist rhetoric and instead propose concrete solutions to Libya’s socioeconomic and security challenges To maintain the momentum gained the ruling block in Libya’s success and become a consistent force for democratic change, secular party will have to go beyond resorting to fierce anti-Islamist rhetoric and instead propose concrete solutions to Libya’s socioeconomic and security challenges. This regime has been fiercely criticized by the political opposition, but secular party share the responsibility for many of the flaws of this cross-ideological experiment.
One may recommend some tasks for Libya’s Secular Party: move beyond anti-Islamist rhetoric and fix structural problems. Secular party need to address their dependency on single-personality politics, lack of party platforms, ideological fragmentation, and resistance to a new generation of leaders. Failure to do so risks a gradual decrease in their current momentum.
In addition, put aside old rivalries to create strong, lasting coalitions. Divisions and frictions will remain as long as secular leaders continue prioritizing personal ambitions or rivalries over unity and collaboration. To maximize the leverages secular party should form several coalitions based on common ideological principles and cooperate through the civil society elements to advance their shared interests. Moreover, democratization from within. In short, to promote party unity, leaders of secular party should consider the views of all members, not just a small cadre of elites, when making decisions.
